For understanding the actual situation, it is highly important to comprehend the historical background.
During President Obama’s visit to Kenya in 2015, the anticipation of his stance on gay rights stirred controversy. Despite American activists urging him to condemn Kenya’s anti-gay law, Kenyan leaders publicly asserted their anti-gay sentiments, leading to increased violence against the LGBTQ+ community.
John Mathenge, director of a Nairobi clinic, described the tense atmosphere before Obama’s visit, causing a decline in clinic visits due to fear of attacks. OutRight Action International cautioned against Obama addressing gay rights in Kenya, advocating for subtler efforts to support LGBTQ+ rights.
US involvement in defending LGBTQ+ rights in Africa over the last years has aided the local movement but also introduced complexities. Activists feel grateful for support but struggle against accusations of being “Western agents,” hindering trust-building with locals. Back in those years, Obama defended gay rights during his visit, prompting an ambiguous response from Kenyan President Kenyatta, which defused anti-gay rhetoric. Despite varied interpretations, Kenyans perceived it as a call to abandon the issue. Consequently, anti-gay legislation was shelved.
The article raises questions about whether increased visibility of LGBTQ+ rights advocates, backed by the West, inadvertently heightens vulnerability. While the US has aided the local LGBTQ+ movement, it has also triggered a backlash in some African nations, using LGBTQ+ issues as political tools.
The perception of LGBTQ+ individuals as having Western backing can be both beneficial and detrimental. Despite the protective role of American intervention, the paradox becomes more evident: the more public support the LBGTQ+ community receives, the greater the envy and danger it faces.
It has been a long path of a social fight from the LGBTQ+ rights in Uganda, during the first days of December, Uganda has strongly criticised the United States’ recent visa restrictions on its officials, interpreting it as an attempt to enforce an “LGBT agenda” in Africa, undermining democracy.
Henry Okello Oryem, State Minister for Foreign Affairs, affirmed that Uganda wouldn’t backtrack on its bill. He stated that certain groups in the U.S. and the West aim to coerce acceptance of same-sex relations using aid and loans as leverage.
The U.S. imposed initial visa restrictions in June following Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Act. This led to the World Bank suspending new lending to Uganda in August. Furthermore, Uganda is set to be excluded from AGOA (African Growth and Opportunity Act) starting January 2024 causing a severe negative economic effect too.
Nowadays, Uganda’s law imposes severe penalties for homosexual relations and promoting homosexuality. “Aggravated homosexuality” carries the death penalty, although it hasn’t been executed for years in Uganda.
Intervening or supporting human rights in another country without disrespecting its sovereignty is a delicate balance. Diplomatic Engagement and expressing concerns about human rights violations through diplomatic channels, promoting dialogue and cooperation is a respectful way to try to achieve international social growth.
While the civil society organisations and public advocacy provide support and protection to local human rights defenders these groups play a crucial role in monitoring human rights violations and promoting awareness.
Our department stands as a steadfast ally and legal advocate for the LGBTQ community. We are committed to providing comprehensive legal support and guidance to address any legal concerns or challenges faced by individuals. Your rights matter, and we’re here to ensure that they are protected and upheld. Should you require legal assistance or guidance, our doors are open, ready to provide tailored solutions and unwavering support for every legal matter affecting the LGBTQ community. Your peace of mind and rights are our priority.
Cynthia Cortés Castillo, Digital Marketing Executive